RaptorPersecutionUK

The charity Hen Harrier Action launches Xmas fundraiser to buy satellite tags

The charity Hen Harrier Action has launched its annual Xmas fundraising appeal, this year with a target of £15K to purchase five satellite tags to be fitted to Hen Harrier chicks in 2026.

As you’ll know, over the last couple of decades, raptor satellite-tagging in the UK has shone a massive spotlight on the widespread scale of the illegal killing of a number of raptor species, especially Hen Harriers and Golden Eagles.

Scientists have been able to analyse the tag data and have demonstrated a clear and unequivocal link between illegal raptor persecution and grouse moor management (e.g. see here, here, here).

In Scotland this has led directly to a change in Government policy, with the recent introduction of a grouse moor licensing scheme, whereby licences for shooting Red Grouse can be suspended/revoked if evidence of raptor persecution (and some other wildlife crimes) is found on a grouse shooting estate.

It has also led to a change in tactics by some of those motivated to kill raptors, who are now apparently choosing to target un-tagged raptors because they want to avoid the media attention and scrutiny that follows the illegal killing or ‘disappearance’ of a tagged bird (e.g. see here).

But fitting a satellite tag doesn’t necessarily mean that that raptor won’t be targeted. There are plenty of examples of tagged birds still being targeted, either because those doing the killing are too stupid to understand what a tag’s data can reveal, or more likely, there are rarely any direct consequences for those who commit these crimes so there’s no incentive for them to stop.

To my mind, the main benefit of continuing to fit satellite tags to Hen Harriers, apart from the obvious research benefits of better understanding this species’ ecology and how it uses the landscape, is that it allows us to document the scale of the ongoing criminality (that would otherwise be hidden and thus would be easily deniable by the grouse shooting industry) and to use those data to put pressure on Governments to address the problem.

As in previous years, any tags purchased by Hen Harrier Action will be fitted by licensed experts from the RSPB who will also monitor and manage the data, and alert the police / Hen Harrier Taskforce if suspicious tag activity is detected.

It also means that Hen Harrier Action will publicise any suspicious disappearances / confirmed illegal killings, without compromising any police investigation, of course, but also without sitting on the data for months, sometimes years, as we’ve seen all too often with tags fitted by Natural England.

If you’re able to contribute to Hen Harrier Action’s Xmas fundraiser, please visit their fundraising site here.

Another Hen Harrier suspected illegally killed on a grouse moor, her satellite tag had been ‘removed’

Over the last few weeks I’ve blogged about a number of illegally-killed Hen Harriers whose deaths have been barely publicised by the authorities, but instead have been quietly entered onto a Government spreadsheet, months, and sometimes over a year later, with little effort to draw the public’s attention to this ongoing criminality.

There was Hen Harrier ‘Susie’ who was found dead with gunshot injuries on a grouse moor in the North Pennines, here; and Hen Harrier ‘254843’ who was found dead on moorland in the Northumberland National Park with shotgun damage to her satellite tag, here; and a Hen Harrier (ref # HSE 107/913) who was found poisoned on a grouse moor in North Yorkshire having ingested a lethal combination of toxic chemicals known as the ‘Nidderdale Cocktail’, so called due to the frequency it is used as a poisoned bait in the Nidderdale National Landscape, killing multiple birds of prey and even a pet dog, here.

Well, here’s another one.

This time its a young Hen Harrier named Margaret, who was fitted with a satellite tag (Tag ID 254844) by Natural England fieldworkers just prior to her fledging from a nest in Northumberland on 5 July 2024.

Natural England staff ‘lost contact’ with Margaret just three months later on 19 October 2024.

The first we knew about this was in Natural England’s intermittent spreadsheet update in December 2024 about the fate of the Hen Harriers that had been satellite-tagged using public funds. Margaret’s entry read as follows:

‘Lost contact 19 October 2024, Northumberland. Missing Fate Unknown, site confidential – ongoing investigation‘.

Whether that meant her tag had suddenly and inexplicably stopped transmitting, or whether the data showed an unusually long period of being static in one place, wasn’t clear.

We didn’t hear anything more until Natural England quietly updated its spreadsheet in October 2025. Margaret’s entry now reads:

‘Missing Fate Unknown. Suspected illegally killed. Tag found removed. Carcase not found. Grid ref NY878497‘.

So, a year after Natural England ‘lost contact’ with this Hen Harrier, we’re finally given a few more details.

This grid reference is in the North Pennines National Landscape (formerly called an AONB), a region that has long been identified as a Hen Harrier persecution hotspot (e.g. see the RSPB’s damning 2025 report, Hen Harriers in the Firing Line, here).

When you zoom in on this map, you’ll be unsurprised to see it is an area dominated by moorland intensively-managed for driven grouse shooting (as demonstrated by the obscene expanse of geometric strips).

According to Guy Shrubsole’s excellent website, Who Owns England?, this grid reference (approximately marked as a red dot on map below) sits on property described as part of the Allendale Settled Estates:

There’s no suggestion that anyone connected to the Allendale Estate is responsible for ‘removing’ Margaret’s satellite tag and/or killing this Hen Harrier. It’s simply a fact that her ‘removed’ satellite tag was found on a grouse moor at this location without any sign of her carcass.

I haven’t seen ANY appeal or press release from Northumbria Police about the suspected illegal killing of this Hen Harrier or the circumstances that led the police to believe her satellite tag had been ‘removed’, presumably cut, over a year ago in October 2024. Not a single word.

I haven’t seen ANY publicity from the National Wildlife Crime Unit-led Hen Harrier Taskforce. This is the specialist group set up explicitly to tackle the ongoing illegal killing of Hen Harriers in England. Not a single word.

I haven’t seen ANY publicity from the police-led national Raptor Persecution Priority Delivery Group (RPPDG), one of whose functions is apparently ‘awareness raising‘ and ‘raising the profile [of illegal raptor persecution] via media exposure‘. Not a single word.

Natural England, who used public funding to pay for the tag, public funding to pay for the fieldworkers to fit the tag to the bird, and public funding to monitor the tag’s subsequent data output, chose not to draw attention to this suspected illegal killing and instead just quietly updated its tag spreadsheet a year later, probably hoping nobody would notice.

I’ve been told by a number of sources that the decision about whether to publicise a crime lies solely with the investigating police force (in this case, Northumbria Police). I’m told that nobody else (e.g. Natural England, National Wildlife Crime Unit’s Hen Harrier Taskforce, the RPPDG) can do this until, or unless, the investigating police force agrees.

That’s understandable in the immediate period after the police have become aware of the crime. They’d want (you’d hope) to be launching an immediate investigation and wouldn’t want the suspects to be alerted because evidence could be removed/hidden before the police have turned up to do a search.

What’s utterly farcical though, is that the investigating police force can ‘sit’ on a case for months, sometimes for over a year, and do nothing, either because (a) their officers are overstretched and don’t have the resources to investigate, (b) their officers are inexperienced or even incompetent, or (c) their officers are corrupt with direct vested interests. Meanwhile, no other organisation, including a specialist police unit, is allowed to mention the suspected crime or appeal for information.

This happens again and again and again with some police forces tasked with investigating raptor persecution on private sporting estates (and some other wildlife crime offences, too, notably fox-hunting). It’s not all police forces by any means – some of them are exemplary and their wildlife crime officers routinely push the limits to try and bring offenders to justice, but some other forces simply aren’t up to the job, for any of the reasons described above.

If it is a ‘rule’ that the investigating police force has supremacy over media output, and other agencies have to sit and wait for a green light that might never come, then this needs to be challenged and changed, especially when there’s a specialist police team waiting on the sidelines ready to act but is effectively handcuffed, blindfolded and gagged. What’s the point of having a specialist team if it doesn’t have the authority to lead on an investigation?

But hang on, Natural England has ‘published’ some details about some of these incidents, albeit very quietly in a spreadsheet that most people don’t even know exists. I suspect they have a duty to do this because public funds are involved.

So why then, in those cases, can’t Natural England accompany that spreadsheet update with a blog, or a press release, or something/anything that would alert the media/public to the ongoing criminality faced by Hen Harriers?

And what’s to stop the other agencies doing likewise? Hen Harrier Margaret ‘disappeared’ and her tag was ‘removed’ over a year ago – you can’t tell me that any publicity now is going to hinder a police investigation!

And besides, I’m blogging about the case, legitimately, using information that’s in the public domain. There’s no reason whatsoever that those agencies can’t do the same.

You’ll be unsurprised to know that Margaret isn’t the last Hen Harrier I’ll be writing about that has ‘disappeared’ in suspicious circumstances in recent months.

I’m also aware that I haven’t recently updated the running ‘death list‘ of missing/dead Hen Harriers…I plan to do this soon but may not get to it quickly as there’s a lot going on right now.

Alleged killing of Red Kites in Cairngorms National Park – trial of two gamekeepers adjourned as Sheriff recuses himself due to RSPB membership

Following on from this morning’s blog about the start of a two-day trial at Aberdeen Sheriff Court today for two gamekeepers accused of alleged offences relating to the illegal killing of Red Kites in the Cairngorms National Park earlier this year (here), it barely got going before being adjourned until next year.

The Sheriff made a declaration of being a monthly subscriber to the RSPB, which resulted in the two defence KCs (King’s Counsel) lodging a motion that the Sheriff should consider recusing himself because the ‘public might perceive some bias’.

After giving the motion some consideration, the Sheriff agreed to stand down because this case involves RSPB staff members as witnesses for the prosecution.

Unfortunately, no other Sheriff was available immediately to hear the case, so it has been adjourned.

We’ve seen this before, in the trial against another Aberdeenshire gamekeeper back in 2012, where the presiding Sheriff was a member of the RSPB and the defence counsel suggested she should stand down, which she did (see here).

It’s frustrating, and a colossally inefficient use of public money, (and presumably adds extra cost for the defence – KCs don’t come cheap) but inefficiency seems to be a hallmark of the judiciary and it is what it is.

The important issue is that the case is decided on the strength of the evidence, not the perceived bias of a presiding Sheriff.

The case will return to the court in April 2026, this time listed as a four-day trial.

NB: Comments are turned off as legal proceedings are still live.

Two Scottish gamekeepers on trial today in relation to alleged killing of Red Kites in Cairngorms National Park

A trial is underway today at Aberdeen Sheriff Court where two gamekeepers are accused of alleged offences in relation to the illegal killing of Red Kites in the Cairngorms National Park earlier this year.

A Head gamekeeper and an assistant gamekeeper were charged in May 2025 ‘in connection with wildlife offences following enquiries into the death of red kites in the Strathdon area of Aberdeenshire in February, 2025′ (see here).

This is believed to be related to the discovery of a shot Red Kite in the Glenbuchat area of Strathdon between 3rd and 4th February 2025 (see here).

The trial has been scheduled for two days.

NB: Comments turned off as legal proceedings are live.

UPDATE 18.20hrs: Alleged killing of Red Kites in Cairngorms National Park – trial of two gamekeepers adjourned as Sheriff recuses himself due to RSPB membership (here)

Peregrine found with shotgun injuries in Peak District National Park

Derbyshire Police Rural Crime Team posted the following on Facebook on 3 December 2025:

WILDLIFE CRIME AWARENESS – INJURED PEREGRINE

Between 01/09/25 – 08/09/25, we received a report from the Youlgrave [Youlgreave] area that a peregrine falcon had been sadly shot.

After x-rays it showed that the incident caused the bird’s wing to shatter.

X-ray provided by Derbyshire Police Rural Crime Team. Annotated by RPUK

Thankfully, this story doesn’t end in tragedy — the peregrine is alive and currently undergoing rehabilitation.

This post is a reminder that peregrines are legally protected, and it is a criminal offence to intentionally injure or kill them under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981.

If you witness wildlife crime or anything suspicious:

Report via 101 or 999

Or report online https://orlo.uk/reportacrime_C7Dn3

If you have any information relating to this incident, please quote 25*580157

Together, we can protect our wildlife

ENDS

It’s not known where or when this Peregrine was shot, but given the extent of its injuries it’s unlikely to have been able to fly far from that location.

I don’t know why it’s taken Derbyshire Constabulary three months to appeal for information on a supposed priority wildlife crime.

Attempt to downlist conservation status of Peregrine Falcons (to allow international trade) is thwarted at CITES conference

To the relief of many raptor conservationists, a proposal to downlist the Peregrine Falcon from Appendix 1 to Appendix II of CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species), which would allow the capture and trade of wild Peregrines) has been thwarted at the 20th Conference of the Parties on CITES (CoP20), currently taking place in Uzbekistan.

*Young Peregrines in the wild, not related to this case (Photo by Ruth Tingay, taken under licence)*

Peregrines have been listed as an endangered species on CITES Appendix 1 since 1975, prohibiting international trade of this species, following the catastrophic effect of pesticides on Peregrine populations globally.

Since then, many populations have ‘recovered’ after significant conservation effort over many decades, although recent declines of ‘recovered’ populations are reported in a number of countries, and the species’ status is still poorly understood in many other countries.

Canada and the USA proposed downlisting the Peregrine from Appendix to 1 to Appendix II to allow capture of wild Peregrines and international trade to meet demands for falconry. Here’s a copy of the proposal to the CITES Conference of Parties:

E-CoP20-Prop-17_0 Download

However, a large number of raptor biologists and conservationists from around the world, many of them specialising in Peregrine research, opposed the proposal and warned of the high risk to some populations.

This excellent paper published recently in the scientific journal Animal Conservation explains those concerns:

Animal Conservation 2025 Saggese et al Peregrine Falcon Populations Under Threat Again Download

A vote on the downlisting proposal took place at the CITES Conference yesterday (3 Dec 2025) and did not receive sufficient support to pass and the proposal was rejected.

Here is a note of what happened, published by the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) in its Earth Negotiations Bulletin as part of its daily CITES Conference reporting:

This is good news for Peregrines globally, but I haven’t seen, nor do I understand, the UK’s rationale for supporting the proposal. If any blog readers have information about that, it’d be interesting to read.

Even if the proposal had been agreed at an international scale, national governments would still retain responsibility for regulating ‘wild take’ in their own countries.

You may remember in March this year, Defra endorsed Natural England’s recommendations for a presumption AGAINST the issuing of licences for taking wild birds of prey for falconry (see here).

The theft of wild Peregrines in the UK for trade continues to be a problem. Recent prosecutions include the conviction of two men found guilty of laundering wild Peregrines stolen from nest sites across south Scotland (see here) and an ongoing prosecution of a man in Worcestershire accused of 21 charges relating to the possession and trade of wild Peregrines (here).

More detail on Natural England’s decision to close Hen Harrier Southern Reintroduction Project

Back in September, Natural England announced its decision to end its controversial plan to ‘reintroduce’ Hen Harriers to southern England (see here).

The decision was widely welcomed by conservationists, who had long argued that Hen Harriers don’t need to be ‘reintroduced’ to southern England, or anywhere else in the UK for that matter. They are perfectly capable of breeding in the wild and recolonising their former range, over a relatively short space of time, IF, and only IF, their survival isn’t curtailed by grouse moor gamekeepers shooting, trapping and poisoning them, pulling off their heads and legs, or stamping on their eggs and chicks.

I’ve blogged about this unhinged ‘reintroduction’ plan for years – see here for a series of links to relevant blogs (scroll to end to find the links).

Whilst Natural England’s decision to close the farce was welcome, the reasons behind it were quite vague:

‘Following a thorough review, it has become clear that Natural England is no longer in a position to provide the long-term funding and resource needed to continue delivering the Hen Harrier Southern Reintroduction project, despite the progress to date. The difficult decision has therefore been made to conclude this project‘.

I submitted an Freedom of Information request to Natural England on 16 September 2025, asking for further detail.

On 13 October 2025 Natural England refused my request, saying it was ‘manifestly unreasonable’ because the cost of providing the information requested would exceed the ‘appropriate limit’ as laid out in the regulations.

Here’s a copy of NE’s response:

EIR2025_10585 – Tingay – Response_redacted Download

Hilariously, Natural England’s response included this line:

‘While Natural England supports openness and transparency, we also have a duty to ensure the effective and responsible use of public funds‘.

I’ll come back to that later in this blog.

Even though NE refused my request, it was still under obligation to assist with my enquiry,, within its cost limitations, so NE gave me two options:

That it would provide a summary of the rationale for the Hen Harrier Southern Reintroduction Project closure, or
That it would provide redacted documentation and a meeting schedule outlining key discussion topics.

I chose option 1, and on 10 November 2025 Natural England provided me with this summary document:

Hen Harrier Southern Reintroduction – Closing Phase – Summary of Reasons Download

This document reveals that two of the wild-disabled captive-held Hen Harriers, brought over from Europe to form the core breeding programme, have since died (cause of death is not given), leaving just four breeding pairs in captivity. In 2025, those birds failed to breed successfully for the third consecutive year.

In addition to this, funding cuts to Natural England, and a demand for increased payment from the International Centre for Birds of Prey (ICBP) to manage the unsuccessful captive breeding programme, meant the project became unviable.

The document states, ‘Natural England has spent heavily on outsourcing breeding to ICBP, with the agreement ending in March 2026‘ [with an additional two-year extension granted].

So what does ‘spent heavily‘ actually mean? How much public funding has Natural England/Defra actually wasted on this pointless project?

Well, according to a Parliamentary response to a written question from Tory MP Kevin Hollinrake in November 2025, NE/Defra is said to have spent a whopping £572,272.

Over half a million pound’s worth of public funding, with nothing to show for it? Good grief.

But take a close look at that parliamentary response from Defra Under-Secretary Mary Creagh MP. It states this funding was spent between March 2021 and October 2025.

So what about the money spent prior to March 2021? Why hasn’t that been factored in?

We know that planning and preparation for this project began as early as 2016 (see here), and has included numerous trips to France & Spain by the project team, trying to persuade the Europeans that sending Hen Harriers to the persecution-infested UK is a good idea, and even included paying for satellite-tags for Harriers in Spain in an attempt to curry favour with the Spanish authorities (see here).

That won’t have been cheap!

How much, in total, has this useless project cost us? And how does Natural England justify spending so much of our money given its “duty to ensure the effective and responsible use of public funds“?

Meanwhile, further north, Hen Harriers continue to be killed illegally on driven grouse moors. Natural England says it has spent £80,800 on the ludicrous Hen Harrier brood meddling trial (the project itself will have cost a great deal more than this but the cost of satellite-tags and doing the actual brood meddling is believed to have been privately funded by grouse moor owners).

Mary Creagh says that a total of 15 Hen Harrier nests were brood meddled, resulting in 58 Hen Harrier chicks subsequently released. She seems to have forgotten to mention that over half of those released birds (at least 31 of the 58) later ‘disappeared’ in suspicious circumstances and/or were illegally killed.

Value for money and public benefit? Not in my book.

Hen Harrier found poisoned on a grouse moor in North Yorkshire

I’ve blogged recently about a number of illegally-killed Hen Harriers whose deaths have not been publicised by the authorities (Hen Harrier ‘Susie’ who was found dead with gunshot injuries on a grouse moor in the North Pennines, here; and Hen Harrier ‘254843’ who was found dead on moorland in Northumberland National Park with shotgun damage to her satellite tag, here).

Here’s another one. This time found illegally poisoned on a grouse moor in North Yorkshire.

A poisoned Hen Harrier in Co Meath, Ireland, November 2019 (NB: not the poisoned HH found in North Yorkshire in January 2025). Photo by RSPB Investigations

Once again, the details of the illegal killing of this latest Hen Harrier have only become public after careful scrutiny of a national database (this one operated by the Health & Safety Executive) – an entry on a spreadsheet rather than a full-blown press release from the investigating authorities.

Here are the limited details that I’ve found:

HSE Ref number 107/913. Confirmed poisoning, North Yorkshire, January 2025. Chemicals Bendiocarb, Carbofuran, Isophenphos, Alphachloralose. Notes: ‘A dead Hen Harrier was found on a grouse moor. Residues of Bendiocarb, Carbofuran, Isophenphos and Alphachloralose were found in the samples analysed, which is an abuse of these compounds. Case closed as passed to the Police‘.

I haven’t seen ANY police appeal or press release about the illegal poisoning of this Hen Harrier or the discovery of its corpse in North Yorkshire 11 months ago in January 2025. Not a single word.

Where is the publicity from the National Wildlife Crime Unit-led Hen Harrier Taskforce? The specialist group set up explicitly to tackle the ongoing illegal killing of Hen Harriers. Not a single word.

Where is the publicity from the police-led national Raptor Persecution Priority Delivery Group (RPPDG), one of whose functions is apparently ‘awareness raising‘ and ‘raising the profile [of illegal raptor persecution] via media exposure‘? Not a single word.

Poisoning is not a commonly-used method for killing Hen Harriers because this species is not a routine carrion eater. Typically they are shot when foraging low for live prey or flying towards a roost site, or trapped on or next to their nest sites and then bludgeoned to death instead. Although there was one case of a Hen Harrier being found poisoned on a Pheasant-shoot in County Meath, Ireland in 2019 (here).

The information I’ve gleaned so far about this latest Hen Harrier poisoning just refers to ‘North Yorkshire’. It’s a huge county, with grouse moors in the Yorkshire Dales National Park, Nidderdale National Landscape (previously called an AONB), and the North York Moors National Park.

However, the eagle-eyed amongst you will have noticed the distinctive combination of chemicals used – a highly lethal mixture widely known as the ‘Nidderdale Cocktail’, so described due to the frequency of use of this nasty combination in Nidderdale, where it has killed a number of birds of prey over the years, particularly Red Kites, and also a pet dog (see here).

That might suggest a Nidderdale grouse moor as the location of the January 2025 Hen Harrier poisoning, although the Nidderdale Cocktail has also been detected in other poisoning cases as far north as Scotland, perhaps indicative of gamekeepers moving jobs, so it’s not conclusive.

This isn’t the first time that I’ve been critical of an apparent lack of action from North Yorkshire Police in relation to a national wildlife crime priority incident. Just a couple of years ago they refused to investigate the circumstances of an illegally poisoned Red Kite that had been found dead on Swinton Estate (see here).

This apparent lack of inertia is in direct contrast to how North Yorkshire Police’s Rural Crime Team used to function a few years ago, under different leadership, when it was proactive and very public about its work (e.g. see here, here, here, here etc).

I’ve submitted a number of FoIs to various agencies about this latest Hen Harrier persecution incident. I’ll report more when they respond.

Goshawk dies from gunshot injuries in Aberdeenshire – Police Scotland appeals for information

Press release from Police Scotland (1 December 2025):

APPEAL FOR INFORMATION AFTER BIRD OF PREY SHOT IN ABERDEENSHIRE

Officers are appealing for information after a bird of prey was shot in Aberdeenshire.

On Saturday, 8 November, 2025, a member of the public found an injured goshawk in the Whiterashes area.

The bird was recovered with the help of the Wild Arc Wildlife Rescue Centre but died before arriving at a vet.

Following further enquiries, it was established that the bird had been shot.

Goshawk with a crow. Photo by Ronnie Gilbert

Constable Ann Ashman, of the Wildlife Crime Unit, said: “Goshawks are protected under the Wildlife and Countryside Act, and it is illegal to kill any protected species.

“Our enquiries are ongoing and we are working with our partner agencies to establish the full circumstances of this incident.

“I would appeal to anyone with any information that may assist our investigation to contact us. Your information could be vital in establishing what has happened.

“If you were in the Whiterashes area that day and saw anything suspicious – or have any information about shooting activity in the area – please contact us.

“Anyone with information is asked to contact Police Scotland on 101, quoting incident number 1942 of 8 November.”

ENDS

Massive decline in Cairngorms National Park Peregrine population linked to intensive grouse moor management

Press release from Cairngorms National Park Authority (24 November 2025)

PEREGRINE NUMBERS IN DECLINE IN CAIRNGORMS NATIONAL PARK

The last UK-wide survey of peregrines took place in 2014 and covered Scotland as a whole, showing a 9% decline in numbers across the country. The Scottish Raptor Monitoring Scheme also found some evidence of a decline from 2009-18; however, no survey was undertaken to assess peregrine populations specifically within the National Park during that time.

In 2024 the Cairngorms National Park Authority collaborated with three of the regional branches of the Scottish Raptor Study Group: Highland, North East of Scotland and Tayside and Fife, to carry out a survey to establish how many peregrine sites within the National Park were occupied and assess their breeding success.

Raptor Study Groups have records going back to the 1960s of sites where peregrines have bred within the Cairngorms National Park and these were used as the basis for the survey. The study shows that the estimated number of peregrine pairs in the breeding season within the National Park has declined by 56% since 2002, with less than half of territorial pairs successfully fledging young in 2024.

Contributing factors are likely to include upland land management practices, decreased prey availability for peregrines, wildlife crime and, more recently, outbreaks of Avian Flu.

It is a complex picture, and more research is needed to understand the key factors and gain a better understand of upland raptor population dynamics – including interspecific competition (ie competition for resources between individuals of different species) and the influence of prey availability. It will require action from the Park Authority working with a range of partners, including the Raptor Study Groups, NGOs and estates on the ground, as well as NatureScot and other public bodies, to explore what can be done to try and turn the tide for peregrine and all raptors in the National Park.

Dr Sarah Henshall, Head of Conservation at the Cairngorms National Park Authority, said: “This is the first time we have been able to get a clear view of peregrine falcon numbers in the National Park and it paints a bleak picture. We will be working closely with Raptor Study Groups, estates and other experts to explore a range of options such as the installation of nest cameras to help us understand bird behaviour, DNA work to support wildlife crime prevention initiatives and GPS tagging to get information on bird movements and survival.

“Our ongoing conservation work, from ecological restoration to increasing the sustainability of moorland management, aims to benefit habitats for peregrine and other key upland species. This survey further highlights the importance of this work and strengthens our resolve to help this iconic bird thrive.”

ENDS

The report can be read / downloaded here:

CNP Peregrine-Survey-2024-Report-Nov-2025 Download

My commentary:

The continued decline of Peregrines in the Cairngorms National Park comes as no surprise whatsoever, and its link to intensively-managed driven grouse moors even less so.

The illegal persecution of Peregrines on driven grouse moors is an issue that has been documented repeatedly in scientific papers since the early 1990s, nationally (e.g. see here) and regionally (e.g. see here for research from northern England). A particularly illuminating paper published in 2015 reported specifically on the decline of breeding Peregrines on grouse moors in North-East Scotland, including those on the eastern side of the Cairngorms National Park (here).

This latest report from the Cairngorms National Park Authority, based on fieldwork undertaken by the Scottish Raptor Study Group, is a welcome addition to the literature and will help inform the new requirement (under the Wildlife Management & Muirburn Act 2024) to monitor and report every five years on the status of a number of raptor species (Peregrine, Golden Eagle, Hen Harrier & Merlin) on grouse moors in Scotland as a measure of how well / badly the legislation is working.

The report’s findings are cautious, citing a number of factors that could be potential drivers influencing the recent decline (e.g. Bird Flu, interspecific competition etc) but these cannot, and do not, account for the long-term decline of Peregrines in the uplands, either within the Cairngorms National Park or in other upland areas. I’m pleased to see the report acknowledge this.

Let’s not kid ourselves. The Cairngorms National Park Authority has known for some time that illegal raptor persecution is a huge issue within the Park boundary – check out what the CNPA was proposing in 2013 to tackle the problem (see here) – unsurprisingly, it didn’t work.

The latest report includes an analysis of the relationship between Peregrine breeding site occupancy and the intensity of grouse moor management (ranging from ‘low’ to ‘high’ management intensity and everything in between).

The results speak for themselves:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this: