Last week I blogged about how the Scottish Government intended to publish its independent Taskforce review on SSPCA powers ‘prior to summer 2023’, even though the review was submitted to Government on 22nd October 2022 (see here).
I pointed out that we may then have to wait another year after publication of the review for the Scottish Government’s response, just as we did with the Werritty Review.
However, journalist Alistair Grant from The Scotsman, has followed up on the story and has managed to get a quote from an unnamed Scottish Government spokeswoman who told him the Government’s response will be published ‘alongside’ the taskforce’s review [‘prior to summer 2023’]. I wonder if this is the same spokeswoman who told him in December 2022 that the Taskforce’s review would be ‘published within weeks‘?!
The Scotsman article includes a further quote from the Government that sidesteps the criticism about why a number of legitimate stakeholders were excluded from participating in the Taskforce’s review.
I’ve submitted a request to the Scottish Government for the full list of stakeholders it provided to the Taskforce Chair, to help understand if the conservation and animal welfare stakeholders were excluded from the review by the Government or by the Taskforce Chair.
Here’s the article in last week’s Scotsman – many thanks to Alistair Grant for following up on this subject.
Concerns have been raised that conservation groups have been excluded from a taskforce set up to consider handing more powers to the Scottish SPCA to allow it to better investigate wildlife crime.
Conservationist Dr Ruth Tingay said the “inherent bias” could leave the Scottish Government “wide open to a potential legal challenge”.
Campaigners have repeatedly criticised the “extraordinary” timeline of delays over the proposals, which were first mooted more than a decade ago.
There are ongoing concerns over the illegal killing of birds of prey in Scotland. Expanding the Scottish SPCA’s current powers would allow it to investigate cases involving animal deaths and illegal traps.
Ministers previously said the taskforce had completed its work and its report would be published within weeks. However, in response to a freedom of information request by Dr Tingay, the Government merely said the report would be published “prior to summer”, despite it being submitted to ministers in October last year.
Dr Tingay, writing on the Raptor Persecution UK blog, said taskforce participants appeared to be “heavily weighted to the game-shooting industry”.
She wrote: “Why were the majority of invited non-governmental organisations those who have previously been vociferous in their opposition to increased SSPCA powers…and who presumably, despite their rhetoric about having a ‘zero tolerance’ for raptor persecution/wildlife crime, are still dead set against measures that would help tackle it?”
If the taskforce recommendations do not support increased powers for the SSPCA, she said, “this inherent bias in participation leaves the Government wide open to a potential legal challenge by conservationists who could argue that their exclusion from participating in the review has resulted in an unfair process”.
The taskforce is chaired by Susan Davies, chief executive of the Scottish Seabird Centre, and its members include Police Scotland, the Crown Office, the SSPCA, RSPB Scotland and NatureScot, as well as the British Association for Shooting Conservation, National Farmers’ Union of Scotland, Scottish Land and Estates and the Scottish Gameekeepers’ Association.
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: “This review was conducted independently, in close consultation with key stakeholders and with support from Police Scotland and the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service. The review was led by Susan Davies who is currently chief executive of the Scottish Seabird Centre and has a wealth of experience in this area.
“We are working with key stakeholders, including Police Scotland and the Crown Office, to consider the findings before the report is published alongside the Scottish Government’s official response.”
ENDS
Raptor Persecution UK 
Let’s hope that it is not a “done deal” and public pressure can be placed to weigh heavily against an outcome that would see the SSPCA barred from participating in the investigation of crimes where some of the participating stakeholders are viewed by many as having a vested interest in the outcome. Suspected in-house conspiracies in regards to crimes against birds of prey could easily be dispelled by allowing the respected SSPCA to participate in the investigations.
Iit’s time Scotland rid itself of post-Culloden politics where a small number of landed interests and their allies have influence way beyond their position.
What an embarrassment…SNP are clearly conflicted