Earlier this month, Environment Minister Stewart Stevenson MSP visited the Langholm Moor Demonstration Project in the Borders. The Langholm Project is an expensive, ten-year project aimed at demonstrating that hen harriers can co-exist with driven grouse shooting. The project is run as a partnership between SNH, Buccleuch Estates, RSPB, GWCT and Natural England. As part of the project, young hen harriers are being fitted with satellite tags to monitor their dispersal movements away from the moor.
The Environment Minister’s visit to Langholm was well publicised with an SNH press release (see here). In this press release, the Minister is quoted as saying: “…it was fascinating to learn that harriers that have been tagged at Langholm are being satellite tracked as far afield as France and Spain”.
Yes, that is fascinating, but of even greater interest is what has happened to the harriers that stayed behind in the UK?
According to the most recent diary entry on the project’s website (October 2011 – see here) written by the Langholm Project’s head gamekeeper, Simon Lester, one of this year’s young harriers has ‘disappeared’ –
“There is good and bad news as far as our satellite-tagged hen harriers are concerned. The ever-intrepid McPedro is certainly heading to France, across the channel from Devon. The sad news is that the hen that hatched in the nest just behind our house — and that I fed for some 60 days — has disappeared in the Moorfoots, having survived well in a relatively small range. The last ‘fix’ (or GPS position transmitted by its satellite tag) was on a shooting estate that co-operated fully when Project staff and the police tried, unsuccessfully, to recover the missing bird. Unfortunately, this bird’s particular satellite tag does not have a ‘ground track’ facility, so it may well have ended up miles away from the last transmitted ‘fix’, as, contrary to popular belief, birds can travel a vast distance in between transmissions. This latest loss is very sad, not just for the Project and our hope that more hen harriers will return to breed here, but is not helpful in our quest to help resolve the on-going raptor/grouse-shooting debate, either“.
Now, this is a fairly one-sided commentary of what might have happened to this young harrier. What Lester failed to mention was that the sporting estate where the harrier’s last known GPS ‘fix’ came from was an estate in the Scottish Borders with a well-documented history of alleged raptor persecution. This particular estate has been the subject of two police raids in the last few years. Illegal pesticides, poisoned baits and poisoned and shot raptors have all reportedly been retrieved from this estate. Apparently, no prosecutions for alleged raptor persecution crime resulted from either raid.
Lester is quite right to point out that just because the last known GPS ‘fix’ of the harrier was on this estate, this doesn’t necessarily mean that the harrier died there. As he says, the harrier could have moved off the estate before the next satellite signal was due, and could have died elsewhere – although if that had happened, why wasn’t there another ‘fix’ from the new location? The transmitter doesn’t die when the bird dies. For all we know though, the bird may not even be dead. It’s possible that the satellite transmitter failed, by coincidence, when the bird was on this estate, and the harrier has since moved away and is alive and well in an unknown location. But there is another plausible explanation too, and one that Lester conveniently chose not to include in his report. That is, this harrier could have been killed illegally on this particular estate, and its body hidden/buried/burnt before the Langholm Project staff arrived to search for it. It’s worth pointing out here that the Langholm Project policy, when searching for missing birds, is to look at the bird’s last known GPS ‘fix’, identify the landowner, and ask for that landowner’s permission before the project staff go searching for the bird, thus giving advance warning of the search.
Why Lester chose not to include this alternative possible explanation in his report about the disappearance of the harrier is not clear. It would seem that the suspicion of foul play had been considered by the project team, given that a wildlife crime police officer accompanied the team to search for the missing bird on this estate. We will wait with interest for the Langholm Project’s formal 2011 annual report to see what information is provided about this particular disappearing harrier, and about all the other tagged harriers from 2010 and 2011. So far, very limited information has been made available about the fate of the six tagged harriers, with the exception of the famed ‘McPedro’, who wisely took off to Spain in his first summer, returned to the UK this spring, and then took off south again this autumn. Given the amount of public funding that is being ploughed into the Langholm Project, a bit more transparency about the fate of some of the other young harriers wouldn’t go amiss.
Langholm Moor Demonstration Project website here
8 thoughts on “Tagged harrier from Langholm mysteriously ‘disappears’”
I seem to recollect an old saying which appears to be appropriate here.
“There’s none so blind as those who will not see”.
so that is both of the 2011 juv tagged female harriers disapeared know on grouse moors? they only lasted a few months what does that say about the future of the hen harrier…………..
The 2010 females (2),also both disappeared in their first few months in grouse moor areas around the Borders. It would appear that the Langholm project is just a sop to the conservation lobby to be seen to be doing something when in fact nothing meaningful will derive from it. Its just a sham.
In such a high profile/expensive project as Langholm 2 could I ask the question, why are we using inferior e.g. ”no ground track facility” and perhaps unreliable satellite-tagging on these birds?
As in this latest case and several before we are left wondering about the exact fate of the bird in question.
Surely in the future we must, regardless of the cost fit these young harriers with state of the art satellite tags.
The article above mentions GPS sat tags a few times but these arent GPS. The lightest GPS that would have been used here is 22g, much 2 heavy (should be <3% of body weight). The tags here were either 9.5 or 12g and the fixes are Doppler. Thus unless bird died at the last location and that fix was a class 3 (may be only one of these a day) then v slim chance of finding it without Ground-track (or a good dog). Ground track costs only an extra $200 per tag so should have had that facility. Bird could have travelled some distance since its last fix and also could have died and be lying belly up and the tag has no chance of transmitting.
Why are we even working in compromise with the shooting estates, why should we have to cowtow to the Raptor persecutors when we know and they know they are clearly breaking the law, why are they not being prosecuted instead of being pandered to by Scottish Natural Heritage and English Nature??? These are the questions we should be asking instead of pretending that our so-called legally protected Raptors will be allowed to co-exist with Red Grouse or any other game bird for that matter. I think we all know the answers as to why, the puppets are having their strings jerked by the puppet masters and will do as they are told.
the first 2011 juv female also disapeared on a moor next door to a very well known moor for all the wrong reasons, whose neighbour is also the rspb reserve where misteriously harriers dont breed there anymore? some people/keepers say at this particular rspb reserve that the habitat and lack of harriers is the reason why they have stopped nesting there these past few yrs, well thanks to the sat tags we have found that the harriers where there, but dont last long or as people find it easier to say ( HAVE DISAPEARED) ……….The rspb have done a fantastic job at this reserve , but there neighbours are equally doing the same at trying to halt the dispersal of the harrier, never mind hundreds of thousands spent on the skydancer project, the money would be well spent on better tags while we still have harriers, trained people on the ground watching/looking for the disapearing harriers on these moors, roosts where they vanish from etc…
No matter how sophisticated the tags are, they are only as good as those who monitor them. Until there is un questionalbe integrity & transparency there, which there clearly is not with the present regime, the deceptions will continue. I repeat a sop & a sham.