Scottish gamekeeper appeals conviction for killing buzzard

A Scottish gamekeeper is appealing his conviction for killing a buzzard.

In August 2015, gamekeeper William (Billy) Dick, now 26, was found guilty of killing a buzzard on the Newlands Estate, Dumfriesshire, in April 2014. Two witnesses had observed him striking the buzzard with rocks and then repeatedly stamping on it (see here). In September 2015 he was sentenced: £1,500 fine for killing the buzzard and £500 for possession of the dead buzzard (see here).

Dick had maintained his innocence throughout the trial and had claimed he was elsewhere when the offence took place (see here).

His appeal was due to be heard this week but has now been delayed until 13th May 2016:

Dick appeal April 2016 postponed - Copy

The outcome of this appeal will be interesting on several levels, not just whether the evidence accepted in the original trial was good enough. The case is tied in with the prosecution of Newlands Estate landowner Andrew Duncan, who is charged with being vicariously liable for the criminal actions of gamekeeper Dick. Andrew Duncan’s case has been repeatedly adjourned while Dick’s appeal is heard (see here).

If Dick’s appeal is upheld, we might expect the allegations against Andrew Duncan to be dropped. If the case against the landowner is dropped, we might expect landowners’ lobby group Scottish Land & Estates (SLE) to reinstate the membership of Newlands Estate, and also reinstate the Newlands Estate accreditation to SLE’s Wildlife Estates Scotland initiative, which, you’ll recall, has been “voluntarily suspended” pending legal proceedings (see here).

Interesting times ahead.

7 thoughts on “Scottish gamekeeper appeals conviction for killing buzzard”

  1. On grounds that “didn’t they know I was a gamekeeper, someone just lost their invite to all the social bashes?” presumably.

  2. More delay. Some system of Justice we have in this country of ours. Keep putting things off for minor judicial reasons or is there something more sinister going on that we don’t know about?

  3. The law always grinds, it’s unusual to find a case that doesn’t have lots or preliminary hearings and delays.

  4. Well, personally, I see any politically important issue of law that is taken to the courts as a form of theatre that is all thoroughly scripted behind the scenes long before the court or the public ever get a whiff of it. Fingers crossed, never-the-less..

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: