Hawk & Owl Trust withdraws from hen harrier brood meddling sham

Blimey! I wasn’t expecting to hear this, but according to an article posted on the BirdGuides website (here), the Hawk & Owl Trust has finally decided to walk away from the hen harrier brood meddling sham.

I haven’t been able to find anything published about it on the Hawk & Owl Trust website but as Chief Operations Director Adrian Blumfield is quoted in the BirdGuides article we can assume there’s more substance to it than just rumour:

“While the Hawk and Owl Trust has supported the Brood-Management Trial to foster co-operation and dialogue between conservationists and land managers, it has always maintained a position that any approach must be guided by robust scientific evidence.

“As the licence comes to a natural conclusion, we believe it is the right time to redirect our efforts toward other conservation initiatives where we can continue to make a meaningful impact.

“The challenges facing Hen Harrier are indicative of broader issues impacting birds of prey and other wildlife across the UK. Looking ahead, the Hawk and Owl Trust remains dedicated to working collaboratively with partners and stakeholders, developing practical, long-term solutions that protect our most vulnerable wildlife species while balancing the interests of the people who share their environment“.

Many of you will remember the Hawk & Owl Trust’s shocking decision in 2014-2015 to get in to bed with the grouse shooting industry in support of hen harrier brood meddling (here). It not only got into bed with them, it pulled up the duvet and stuck in some heavy duty ear plugs, refusing to be budged.

It cost the Trust dearly, as their President (Chris Packham) resigned, a load of members cancelled their subscriptions, and the charity’s credibility has never recovered in conservation circles. Much of the Trust’s decisions seemed to be led by the then Chair, Philip Merricks, but Trust statements at the time claimed that the decisions had the full backing of the Board of Trustees (at least two of whom were directly involved with the brood meddling trial, which seemed a bit questionable).

The Trust claimed to have several ‘immoveable conditions’ attached to its participation in brood meddling, not least that it would pull out ‘if any member of the moorland management organisations were found to have illegally interfered with or persecuted a hen harrier on their moors’ (here). We later learned that the ‘immoveable conditions’ were actually very moveable indeed (see here) and weren’t worth the paper they’d been printed on.

Needless to say, persecution continued and even when one of the hen harriers (called Rowan), satellite-tagged by Natural England in association with the Hawk & Owl Trust, was found dead with clear shotgun injuries to its leg, the Trust did all it could to avoid admitting the bleedin’ obvious (e.g. see here, here, here).

Even when the shotgun injuries were proven on Rowan, the Hawk & Owl Trust continued its charade (see here, here and here).

So whilst the Hawk & Owl Trust’s withdrawal from the brood meddling sham doesn’t appear to be based on principle per se (if it was, they should have left years ago when it was obvious that illegal persecution was continuing), nevertheless their withdrawal will be seen as a blow to the grouse moor industry because they often used the Hawk & Owl Trust’s involvement as a signal that ‘raptor conservationists’ were supportive of the sham trial.

As I mentioned a couple of days ago (here), Natural England is currently ‘reviewing and analysing the data’ from the hen harrier brood meddling sham before making a decision about whether or not to roll out brood meddling as an annual so-called ‘conservation licence’. The findings of that review will apparently be available by the end of this year.

UPDATE 21 November 2024: More detail on Hawk & Owl Trust’s withdrawal from hen harrier brood meddling sham (here).