Today was the opening day of Chris Packham’s libel case at the Royal Courts of Justice against three individuals who are accused of a number of alleged defamatory actions against Chris.
There’s a pretty good write up of today’s events in the Guardian – here.
The court heard a small sample of that ‘puerile and offensive’ material as Chris’s barrister laid out the basis for the case. I suspect there may be much more of that to come given the appalling vitriol towards Chris, so obviously on public display over the two years this case has been in preparation.
The judge, the Honourable Mr Justice Saini, was scrupulously fair and reasonable today, clearly setting out, amongst other things, what he would and wouldn’t tolerate in the cross-examination phase, which begins tomorrow. The barrister for defendants 1 & 2, Nicholas O’Brien, was given a very clear direction from the judge about a particular line of questioning he intended to take when cross-examining Chris. Mr Justice Saini reminded Mr O’Brien to consider his ‘professional responsibilities’ when choosing his questions.
Fascinating!
UPDATE 4th May 2023: Chris Packham’s witness statement reveals devastating impact of the hate campaign against him (here)
Raptor Persecution UK 
I had a quick look at Country Squire Magazine (just curious) and was horrified to read the phrase “Old Ruth ‘Goebbels’ Tingay”. Blimey
Chris Packham is right to bring this action. For his own mental health. For the sake of wildlife. To highlight the childish and stupid behaviour of people who should know better. To help put an end to the persecution of people who support wildlife/pets/farmed animals. To enable people to speak up, without fearing for their own and their families safety. Good luck Chris.
Chris Packham – you truly are the most amazing brave guy, keep doing what you do, I cant thank you enough for what you do for all wildlife!