DEFRA has responded on behalf of the Westminster Government to the latest petition calling for a ban on driving shooting.
Here is DEFRA’s pathetic statement in full:
16th January 2025
The Government has no plans to ban driven grouse shooting. It recognises well-managed grouse shooting can be an important part of a local rural economy, providing direct and indirect employment.
This is a devolved matter. The Government appreciates that many people hold strong views on the issue of driven grouse shooting. The Government considers that well-managed shooting activities can bring benefits to the rural economy and can be beneficial for wildlife and habitat conservation. We will continue work to ensure a sustainable, mutually beneficial relationship between shooting and conservation. The Government has no plans to ban grouse shooting.
It is of course vital that wildlife and habitats are protected and the law is respected by those involved in the grouse shooting industry. Wild birds of prey, for example, are protected under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981. There is evidence from Ewing et al (2023) and others to suggest a link between crimes against birds of prey and grouse shooting. The Government supports the National Wildlife Crime Unit (NWCU) – which helps prevent and detect crimes against wildlife by obtaining and disseminating intelligence and directly assisting law enforcers in their investigations – and the Hen Harrier Task Force – which is led by the NWCU and aims to detect, deter, and disrupt offenders, in particular those persecuting rare hen harriers – by using technology and improving partnership working. Where wild birds of prey or any non-target species of wildlife are killed illegally the full force of the law should apply to proven perpetrators of the crime. All forms of predator management to protect grouse must be undertaken within the law, including compliance with animal welfare legislation.
Grouse shooting takes place in upland areas, which are important for a range of things including, food, fibre, water regulation, carbon storage, biodiversity and recreational opportunities. UK uplands have 75 per cent of the world’s remaining heather moorland and about 13 per cent of the world’s blanket bog.
Upland catchments provide 70 per cent of the UK’s drinking water. The Government is committed to delivering positive environmental and economic benefits and creating a more sustainable future for the English uplands, including preserving and restoring peatlands.
Healthy, active peat provides good habitat for grouse as well as numerous environmental benefits. Through the Nature for Climate Peatland Grant Scheme, the Government is continuing to invest millions of pounds in peatland restoration, to aid climate change mitigation and nature recovery. The Government’s new and improved Countryside Stewardship offer will be available this summer. This scheme will encourage land managers to enter into agreements to enhance and protect the natural environment, including upland peatland habitats.
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
ENDS
It looks similar to previous Government responses on this issue but of course this one is from a Labour Government, not a vested-interest Conservative Government, which makes it all the more inadequate.
I note the frequent use of the words ‘can’ and ‘should’ within the statement, without acknowledging that the reason this issue keeps being put in front of politicians is precisely because intensively managed driven grouse moors are NOT beneficial for wildlife and habitat conservation, that the laws around killing protected species are NOT respected, and when birds of prey are killed illegally on grouse moors the full force of the law is NOT applied.
The statement also perpetuates the long-held shooting industry myth that “UK uplands have 75 per cent of the world’s remaining heather moorland“. No, they do not and this inaccurate claim has long been debunked by leading academics (e.g. see here) and has even been acknowledged by the GWCT (see here). The petitioners, Wild Justice, have written to complain to the Petitions Committee about DEFRA’s reliance on factual inaccuracy.
I’ve seen it suggested on social media that this response from Government should ‘shut up Wild Justice once and for all”. Well, to quote Ian Hislop:
“When a Government in this country loses an election, the opposition doesn’t just say, ‘Oh, that’s absolutely right, I’ve got nothing to say for the next five years’. We are entitled to go on making the argument“.
If anything, this piss-poor response to the petition from DEFRA and the Westminster Government only strengthens our resolve to continue making the argument and they can expect to see an increase in our campaigning efforts over the coming months, to reach 100,000 signatures and force a debate at Westminster Hall.
If you haven’t signed the petition already, please do so here.
My colleague Mark Avery has written a blog about DEFRA’s response, here.












