There’s an opinion piece in The Scotsman today written by Max Wiszniewski, Campaign Manager for REVIVE, the coalition for grouse moor reform.
The article is open access here.
Max’s article contains some interesting details such as:
‘Despite taking up 57 per cent of rural Scotland, private estates provide just three per cent of rural homes. This figure was obtained from recent research published by Scottish Land and Estates. The same report showed that 78 per cent of estates were still involved in ācountry sportsā like grouse and deer shooting‘.
And
‘Despite claims from the industry that sport shooting is good for the economy, it only contributes about 0.03 per cent of Scotlandās economy. In other words, if Scotlandās economy was the height of Ben Nevis, sport shootingās contribution would be the size of a bottle of Irn-Bru. Is this worth all the animal cruelty and environmental devastation that sport shooting still causes to this day?
Land use is about choices, and the consequences of these choices define whether Scotlandās rural economies and rural ecologies thrive or not. Currently, the concentrated ownership of Scotlandās land means that these choices are made by very few people. For the benefit of whom?‘
The article is a primer for the REVIVE Coalition’s national conference this weekend at Perth Concert Hall, where the focus is on land reform and will see the launch of a year-long initiative called the Big Land Question, to identify how the ownership and management of Scotlandās land could be improved for the majority rather than just a few large landowners.
Tickets cost £8 (£5 concession) and are available from the venue HERE.



That is a pretty powerful lineup. Good luck to them.
Careful now: I mentioned Andy Wightman and The Poor Had No Lawyers on here a while back and someone had a good pop at me for introducing politics to a blog about raptor persecution, because, as we all know, politics has no bearing (yes, that was sarcasm…).
When can we have an English equivalent to Poor Had… ?