Highly pathogenic avian influenza confirmed in red grouse in Scotland

A case of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI), otherwise known as bird flu, has been confirmed in red grouse in Scotland, according to DEFRA.

Red grouse. Photo: RSPB Images

The confirmation has appeared in DEFRA’s running tally of confirmed bird flu cases in wild birds, which is a spreadsheet that’s updated weekly (see here).

The spreadsheet entry states that H5N1 was detected in a red grouse in week 30 (July 24 – July 30 2023) in the Scottish Borders:

There isn’t any more detail about the location, nor how many birds have been found infected/dead, just that a single bird has been tested and found to be positive.

If this infected red grouse was found on land managed for driven grouse shooting it’s of serious concern. Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza causes severe disease and high mortality in birds and has already killed tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of wild birds in the UK, impacting on the populations of globally significant species.

Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza is transmitted by the spreading between birds of nasal secretions and droppings, and it also spreads to birds of prey via the predation of infected birds. Some UK raptor species have already been badly affected, including golden eagles and white-tailed eagles (e.g. see here).

We know that many driven grouse moors are (mis)managed to produce an artificially-high density of red grouse for shooting. Another highly contagious disease, Cryptosporidiosis (Bulgy Eye) is rife on many intensively-managed driven grouse moors. It was first detected in wild red grouse in England in 2010 and then spread rapidly, via communal medicated grit trays, and by 2015 had affected high density red grouse on half of the 150 grouse moors in northern England. It has also been detected in Scotland, although the extent of the spread in Scotland is not known because the shooting industry is keeping quiet, and, for reasons unknown, NatureScot isn’t undertaking any surveillance of the disease (see here).

A grit tray on a grouse moor containing red grouse faecal droppings – a disease reservoir. Photo: Ruth Tingay

If the highly contagious Cryptosporidiosis disease can spread so rapidly via red grouse secretions and droppings found in grit trays on the moors, then so can Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza.

Last year I argued that it would be ‘irresponsible’ for grouse-shooting to go ahead during the avian flu epidemic (see here). In response, the Scottish Government said: ‘…there have been no recorded cases of avian influenza in any grouse species, and there are no restrictions in place on grouse shooting’.

Given that Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza has now been confirmed in red grouse in the Scottish Borders, and the grouse-shooting season opens on Saturday (the Inglorious 12th), how will the Scottish Government respond?

Shouldn’t they be restricting shooting as a precautionary measure, at least until the extent of the disease is evaluated?

14 thoughts on “Highly pathogenic avian influenza confirmed in red grouse in Scotland”

  1. I’m dusting off my ‘mealy-mouthed-claptrap-detector’ for the inevitable dispiriting responses from DEFRA and/or NatureScot. There is more chance of a successful hen harrier
    nest inside a grouse butt than DGS being stopped this year methinks.

  2. It would be interesting to hear from the shooting industry what biosecurity measures are being adopted in response to confirmed cases of HPAI

  3. I don’t think this outbreak will have any effect on the shooting as I understand avian flu was already widely prevalent in wild birds before this recent reported case.
    However there should be some concern for those who will be working on the grouse moors in the coming months once the shooting season starts and who could come into contact with infected birds – particularly the “pickers up” who will be handling the shot birds. The advice to date has been not to touch or handle any dead birds found in the countryside.
    I hope there is a rapid response from the likes of DEFRA / NatureScot / Natural England which provide clear guidelines for the shooting industry to minimise the risk to those who will be working on the grouse moors.
    Likewise, this should be of concern to NGA, the Scottish Game Keepers association and bodies such as BASC and GWCT etc who should also rapidly advise their members on suitable safety precautions prior to the 12th August.

    It would be an absolute tragedy if someone or their working dog contacted this illness as a result of touching infected game. Because that “someone” is most likely to be a member of a rural community who only helps on the shooting estates during the shooting season and uses the money earned to supplement their income.

  4. The only way any action will be taken is…..if someone catches it.
    What a difference between the shooting fraternity and farmers with castles who saw whole dynasty milking herds killed and burnt on huge pyres and pet goats/sheep slaughtered in vicinities.
    Is it right that red grouse should be bred with sole intent of shooting them for fun??
    And pheasants come to that.
    There should be immediately testing for the disease as soon as the shooting starts and if other cases found, well I guess they will have to shoot and capture as many as possible with strict hygiene rules???How would one contain this??

  5. I wonder what the impact on the spaniels and labs will be. Are they vulnerable to the disease or is it just the human pickeruppers who will catch it?

  6. Elevating, through intensive habitat management and ruthless predator control, a species population to levels unsustainable in the natural environment has its drawbacks…..

  7. I suspect the economic argument will win, that it brings money into the estates and to Scotland. The Hooray Henrys will have some influence as well. It is to be hoped that the virus doesn’t spread but this seems unlikely.

  8. New to science, H5N1 found being passed in milk within terrestrial mammals across the USA. One diary worker infected (first recorded event of cow-to-human transmission). Low mortality rate in cattle, but very high mortality rate (50%) in cats drinking untreated milk.

    Virus also spreading from dairy cattle premises into nearby poultry premises.

    Whether H5N1 is also being passed within cattle through the respiratory system is simply unknown.

    Biden administration has been sitting on this information for a couple of months (according to researcher), released by CDC in April.

    “This is a rapidly changing, emerging situation and CDC is committed to providing frequent and timely updates.”

    “Additionally, unpasteurized (“raw”) milk from sick cattle has tested positive for A(H5N1) viruses. Consumption of raw milk can be dangerous and is not recommended.”

    (Tip-off from World Service interview with researcher from University of Texas in the early hours of 3rd May)

    https://www.cdc.gov/flu/avianflu/mammals.htm

    https://www.cdc.gov/flu/avianflu/spotlights/2023-2024/one-health-situation-update.htm

    https://www.cdc.gov/ncird/whats-new/human-infection-H5N1-bird-flu.html

Leave a comment