Extensive fire damage from Moy grouse moor ‘hair cut’

The muirburn season has re-opened (1 Oct – 15 Apr) and it hasn’t taken long for the grouse moor hairdressers to splash around the fire accelerant and bring out the blow torches.

This is a photo of a fire on the Moy Estate grouse moor at 21.43hr on Wednesday night (5th October 2016). For perspective, the photo was taken from 5km away in Daviot. A pretty big fire then.

fire1

And here’s a photo taken the following day showing the extent of this fire. The area burned was huge and this image only shows part of it as the damage extends over the hill. Doesn’t look much like small ‘patch’ or ‘strip’ burning, does it? Perhaps it wasn’t muirburn after all?

fire2

The fire wasn’t properly extinguished and was left unattended. Isn’t that against the muirburn code?  This photo was taken on the afternoon of Thursday 6th Oct at 17.10hr. Here the fire has engulfed one of the estate’s middens (stink pits) where the rotting carcasses of dead wildlife are dumped and the area ring-fenced with snares to catch any animal that comes along to investigate the putrid remains.

fire3

This photo was taken at 17.35hr on Thursday 6 Oct. The fire was still unattended and creeping towards the FCS forestry block, 200m away.

fire5

It’s ok though, nothing to worry about because “burning heather is the same as getting your hair cut“.

25 thoughts on “Extensive fire damage from Moy grouse moor ‘hair cut’”

  1. How can this be justified; when arable farmers are quite rightly prohibited from burning straw. This burning,which does far more damage to the underlying peat,and surely contravenes the clean air act is allowed to continue.When will the laws of this nation be upheld?

  2. Dont worry SNH will deal with this in the firmest possible way……………..they treat damage to sssi,s very seriously

    And do precisely NOTHING about it

    1. Believe it or not, SNH still recommends muirburn for Hen Harrier SSSIs. In fact they make it compulsory within the terms of management agreements with landowners! They accommodate the wishes of landowners so much nowadays that it amounts to a form of servility. It’s time our wild lands were nationalised, not left in the hands of those who own them due to an accident of birth. It’s hard to believe that these already wealthy private landowners are delivered generous subsidies for simply owning land classified as farmland, whether or not they do any actual farming. We live in a society that has its priorities all wrong, and I get the feeling things are going to get worse under the new Tories. The Scottish Government is also planning further cost-cutting changes which may involve merging FCS and SNH. I believe this will almost certainly lead to a further diminishment of the societal value placed upon nature conservation.

  3. Disgusting way to treat the land. They should most definatly be punished fir allowing it to burn out of control, but I can’t see Police Scotland or SNP ministers doing anything about it.

  4. “Nay laddie its ‘traditional’

    All grist to the mill an useful contribution to the Westminster Inquiry on Driven Grouse Shooting.

  5. And what is it all in aid of? I’ll tell you. It’s manipulating, exploiting and killing a wild, indigenous species which no more belongs to them than it does to you or I. They are shooting the surplus birds which, before DSG developed in the mid-1800s, were the naturally occurring food supply for species such as Hen Harrier, Peregrine etc.. They’ve stood the balance of nature on its head. It’s high time that this was reversed

    1. I could not agree more with your comments. Quiet, articulate, reasoned and factual arguments will come out on top in the end and the shooting lobby now know this as well as we do. This is a brilliant website. Keep going because ordinary people who care for wildlife and how the countryside is managed will decisively win this argument with you, sooner rather than later.

  6. A quick walk over the moor will reveal the burned lizards, snakes and voles. I did not know that setting them on fire was a legal way of killing them….and I’m sure its a special type of painless fire they use… But its not mentioned on the General Licence…???

  7. Anyone got details who we can direct our complaints to……….

    I am unaware of any instances where any action has ever been taken (by SNH or any other agency) in instances where the laws controlling muirburn have been broken.

    SNH obviously are hoping to govern land management by giving land owners money and when they break the law …..give them more money.

    1. I complained to Tayside Fire Brigade about the burning practises on Millden, Glen Esk in the early 2000’s. (Correspondence retained) This was because they, the Fire Brigade were frequently called out to put out fires which had gone out of control. Representatives paid me a visit and informed me they were going to issue the estate with a warning. Next day my wife and I went on to the hill to watch the heather burners at work. After concealing ourselves we saw them start small fires and then jump in their vehicle, drive a 100 yards or so and start another fire. At one point there were 5 different fires on the go. It was common, in our experience, to see them set fires on windy days, on wetlands and on very steep terrain. Simply put. they are a law unto themselves once their vehicles hit the hill tracks.

      1. They are not shy about this sort of irresponsible rule breaking…. they are happy to do it in the full view of the A9… and expect to get away with impunity..
        The trouble is that the Muirburn Code is only really a sort of guidelines which have no weight and can not be in forced. Everyone knows that the code needs revamping and work is under way. The only thing is that Scottish Government have asked the Moorland Association to draft up the replacement! The lunatics are being asked to design the asylum! You couldn’t make it up.

  8. Wait a moment. If the area burnt was huge, isn’t this counter-productive for producing a surplus of red grouse? What are the grouse going to eat over the winter period? It will take some time for the heather to re-generate. Assuming gamekeepers started the fire and through accident or negligence it got out of control, haven’t they ruined their own shoot?

  9. If I went into a field and started a massive fire I’d be charged with arson. Why aren’t these idiots?

  10. Your being a bit disingenuous re heather burning.
    Much as my instinct is against heather burning, if you look at any area where wildfires can and will happen.
    The one thing you don’t want is a fire every 30 years or so.
    By this time the heather will be huge, and the area the fire can spread to will be massive.
    Look at the wildfires behind Fort William a couple of years ago in the exact circumstances.
    These moors will burn at some time what ever.
    There is certainly a case for small and often, in a season when least damage is done to the wildlife rather than massive in infrequent and often at the worst possible time for wildlife.
    Not having controlled burning is probably the main negative in rewilding for me.

  11. Still lots of smoke and burning over a considerable area visible from the A9 yesterday evening. (11/10/2016)

    1. Reporting such incidents to the emergency services should help reveal whether the fires are deliberate muirburn by gamekeepers or acts of vandalism. Fires on that scale should be extinguished by the Fire Brigade.

Leave a comment